Surveys should never ask for any sensitive or secure data. Do not provide passwords, credit card numbers, identification numbers, or other sensitive information. Report Abuse.
Skip survey header
English

Preview / Test View

This link is intended for testing purposes only. It is not recommended that you distribute this link.
Show Comments
Loading comments...
COMMENT MODE
0

Global Shared Research Agenda: Priority Setting Domain 3 & 4

1. In which region is your work focused? Select all that apply
0
0
3. What is your gender?
0
4. We are committed to representing the voices of different groups in the priority setting exercise. Do you identify as being part of any of the following groups? Select all that apply.
0
5. Does your work primarily focus on any of the following groups? Select all that apply
0
6. How would you describe your current role/organisation? Select one
0
7. Which group are you a member of?
0
8. Please score each of the research questions in domain three for applicability by answering each of the three sub-questions 'yes', 'no' or 'I don't know'.

Domain 3: Improving existing interventions (including scale-up research,  implementation research, adaptation, costing research, intervention science, process research and other form of research that generate innovative solutions to improve existing interventions making them more deliverable, more affordable or more sustainable, and understanding the impact of policies and laws on VAWG):

Improving existing interventions refers to understanding how positive or promising impacts of interventions can be scaled up to access larger populations, benefit more people and to foster policy and programme development on a more sustainable basis, including generating knowledge about the costs of VAWG and of implementing VAWG prevention and response interventions. This domain also includes the impact of developing, implementing and scaling up sustainable violence prevention initiatives at national government level, including policies, frameworks and laws that aim to prevent VAWG. A critical element of this domain is access to funding required to adapt and scale up interventions to different contexts, and to ensure that resource distribution is equitable and reaches marginalised groups, including those with intersecting identities. 


Criteria: Applicability
Some research ideas will be more likely to produce knowledge that is applicable to local political and cultural contexts and be applied in policy and practice.
0
1. Will the research findings produce interventions that are relevant, and applicable to the local context? 2. Will the research findings translate to practical actions and interventions in the next 5-7 years? 3. Will the research benefits balance with the time, costs, resources and community labour required to undertake the research? 
Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know
TableRow-0
TableRow-1
TableRow-2
TableRow-3
TableRow-4
TableRow-5
TableRow-6
TableRow-7
TableRow-8
TableRow-9
TableRow-10
9. Please score each of the research questions in domain three for effectiveness by answering each of the three sub-questions 'yes', 'no' or 'I don't know'.

Domain 3: Improving existing interventions (including scale-up research,  implementation research, adaptation, costing research, intervention science, process research and other form of research that generate innovative solutions to improve existing interventions making them more deliverable, more affordable or more sustainable, and understanding the impact of policies and laws on VAWG):

Improving existing interventions refers to understanding how positive or promising impacts of interventions can be scaled up to access larger populations, benefit more people and to foster policy and programme development on a more sustainable basis, including generating knowledge about the costs of VAWG and of implementing VAWG prevention and response interventions. This domain also includes the impact of developing, implementing and scaling up sustainable violence prevention initiatives at national government level, including policies, frameworks and laws that aim to prevent VAWG. A critical element of this domain is access to funding required to adapt and scale up interventions to different contexts, and to ensure that resource distribution is equitable and reaches marginalised groups, including those with intersecting identities.


Criteria: Effectiveness
Some research ideas will be more likely to generate innovative, sustainable, effective interventions, or improve existing promising interventions. 
0
1. Will the research produce novel findings?
2. Will the research contribute to sustainable interventions that can reduce VAWG in the 5-7 years? 3. Will the proposed research produce findings about good practice that can be effectively communicated and disseminated and where appropriate taken to scale?
Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know
TableRow-0
TableRow-1
TableRow-2
TableRow-3
TableRow-4
TableRow-5
TableRow-6
TableRow-7
TableRow-8
TableRow-9
TableRow-10
10. Please score each of the research questions in domain three for equity by answering each of the three sub-questions 'yes', 'no' or 'I don't know'. 

Domain 3: Improving existing interventions (including scale-up research,  implementation research, adaptation, costing research, intervention science, process research and other form of research that generate innovative solutions to improve existing interventions making them more deliverable, more affordable or more sustainable, and understanding the impact of policies and laws on VAWG):

Improving existing interventions refers to understanding how positive or promising impacts of interventions can be scaled up to access larger populations, benefit more people and to foster policy and programme development on a more sustainable basis, including generating knowledge about the costs of VAWG and of implementing VAWG prevention and response interventions. This domain also includes the impact of developing, implementing and scaling up sustainable violence prevention initiatives at national government level, including policies, frameworks and laws that aim to prevent VAWG. A critical element of this domain is access to funding required to adapt and scale up interventions to different contexts, and to ensure that resource distribution is equitable and reaches marginalised groups, including those with intersecting identities.


Criteria: Equity
Some research will be more likely to produce findings that challenge inequalities, and be accessible and equitable to underprivileged or marginalised groups, or conversely, the research findings could perpetuate inequalities.
1
1. Would you agree the questions would produce findings that would benefit groups with greater vulnerability to violence? 2. Do you think the research question could perpetuate or reinforce inequalities and/or harmful attitudes towards more vulnerable groups? 3. Would the research effectively and meaningfully involve and engage with the affected community?
Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know
TableRow-0
TableRow-1
TableRow-2
TableRow-3
TableRow-4
TableRow-5
TableRow-6
TableRow-7
TableRow-8
TableRow-9
TableRow-10
0
12. Please score each of the research questions in domain four for applicability by answering each of the three sub-questions 'yes', 'no' or 'I don't know'.

Domain 4: Methodological and measurement gaps (including new and innovative ways to measure VAWG, hierarchies of knowledge, practice-based learning, sticky ethical issues, and monitoring and evaluation of interventions):

Methods and measures refers to the methodologies and research instruments we use to measure the different forms of VAWG, and their validity, reliability and accuracy. For example are the measures we use valid (e.g. are they measuring what they are supposed to?) and reliable (e.g. the consistency of how a person answers over time to the same question/scale); are the methods we use e.g. surveys, questionnaires, scales, scored appropriately; can we use standardised methods, measures across studies; how can we mitigate limitations in measuring accurate VAWG prevalence data, including recall bias and social desirability bias? This domain also includes addressing limitations in VAWG evaluation approaches, for instance, how to avoid spill over effects for control or comparison group populations in experimental or quasi-experimental approaches.


Criteria: Applicability
Some research ideas will be more likely to produce knowledge that is applicable to local political and cultural contexts and be applied in policy and practice.
0
1. Will the research findings produce interventions that are relevant, and applicable to the local context? 2. Will the research findings translate to practical actions and interventions in the next 5-7 years?  3. Will the research benefits balance with the time, costs, resources and community labour required to undertake the research? 
Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know
TableRow-0
TableRow-1
TableRow-2
TableRow-3
TableRow-4
TableRow-5
TableRow-6
TableRow-7
TableRow-8
TableRow-9
13. Please score each of the research questions in domain four for effectiveness by answering each of the three sub-questions 'yes', 'no' or 'I don't know'.

Domain 4: Methodological and measurement gaps (including new and innovative ways to measure VAWG, hierarchies of knowledge, practice-based learning, sticky ethical issues, and monitoring and evaluation of interventions):

Methods and measures refers to the methodologies and research instruments we use to measure the different forms of VAWG, and their validity, reliability and accuracy. For example are the measures we use valid (e.g. are they measuring what they are supposed to?) and reliable (e.g. the consistency of how a person answers over time to the same question/scale); are the methods we use e.g. surveys, questionnaires, scales, scored appropriately; can we use standardised methods, measures across studies; how can we mitigate limitations in measuring accurate VAWG prevalence data, including recall bias and social desirability bias? This domain also includes addressing limitations in VAWG evaluation approaches, for instance, how to avoid spill over effects for control or comparison group populations in experimental or quasi-experimental approaches.


Criteria: Effectiveness
Some research ideas will be more likely to generate innovative, sustainable, effective interventions, or improve existing promising interventions.
0
1. Will the research produce novel findings? 2. Will the research contribute to sustainable interventions that can reduce VAWG in the next 5-7 years? 3. Will the proposed research produce findings about good practice that can be effectively communicated and disseminated and where appropriate taken to scale?
Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know
TableRow-0
TableRow-1
TableRow-2
TableRow-3
TableRow-4
TableRow-5
TableRow-6
TableRow-7
TableRow-8
TableRow-9
14. Please score each of the research questions in domain four for equity by answering each of the three sub-questions 'yes', 'no' or 'I don't know'.

Domain 4: Methodological and measurement gaps (including new and innovative ways to measure VAWG, hierarchies of knowledge, practice-based learning, sticky ethical issues, and monitoring and evaluation of interventions):

Methods and measures refers to the methodologies and research instruments we use to measure the different forms of VAWG, and their validity, reliability and accuracy. For example are the measures we use valid (e.g. are they measuring what they are supposed to?) and reliable (e.g. the consistency of how a person answers over time to the same question/scale); are the methods we use e.g. surveys, questionnaires, scales, scored appropriately; can we use standardised methods, measures across studies; how can we mitigate limitations in measuring accurate VAWG prevalence data, including recall bias and social desirability bias? This domain also includes addressing limitations in VAWG evaluation approaches, for instance, how to avoid spill over effects for control or comparison group populations in experimental or quasi-experimental approaches.

Criteria: Equity
Some research will be more likely to produce findings that challenge inequalities, and be accessible and equitable to underprivileged or marginalised groups, or conversely, the research findings could perpetuate inequalities.
0
1. Would you agree the questions would produce findings that would benefit groups with greater vulnerability to violence? 2. Do you think the research question could perpetuate or reinforce inequalities and/or harmful attitudes towards more vulnerable groups? 3. Would the research effectively and meaningfully involve and engage with the affected community?
Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know Yes No I don't know
TableRow-0
TableRow-1
TableRow-2
TableRow-3
TableRow-4
TableRow-5
TableRow-6
TableRow-8
TableRow-9
TableRow-10
0
Survey Software powered by SurveyGizmo
Survey Software