We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

RC1 - Adjunct Faculty Integris Canadian Valley Spring

This evaluation contains questions regarding the Adjunct Faculty at Integris Canadian Valley Spring. The feedback from your evaluation is important to us as we continue to improve our program. Your responses will remain anonymous.

Use the mouse to click on the button that best represents your response. If you choose "Needs Improvement" or "Unsatisfactory" on any adjunct faculty, please explain your choice. We cannot make improvements without this important information.

Thank you for your input.

1. Please evaluate the overall performance of the adjunct faculty you were assigned to during your rotation.

	Outstanding	Very Good	Satisfactory	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory
Jenny Buss	Outstanding of row Jenny Buss-	Very Good of row Jenny Buss-	Satisfactory of row Jenny Buss-	Needs Improvement of row Jenny Buss-	Unsatisfactory of row Jenny Buss-
Ciera Cooper	Outstanding of row Ciera Cooper-	Very Good of row Ciera Cooper-	Satisfactory of row Ciera Cooper-	Needs Improvement of row Ciera Cooper-	Unsatisfactory of row Ciera Cooper-
Kevin England	Outstanding of row Kevin England-	Very Good of row Kevin England-	Satisfactory of row Kevin England-	Needs Improvement of row Kevin England-	Unsatisfactory of row Kevin England-
Sara Joseph	Outstanding of row Sara Joseph-	Very Good of row Sara Joseph-	Satisfactory of row Sara Joseph-	Needs Improvement of row Sara Joseph-	Unsatisfactory of row Sara Joseph-
Courtney Kaniewski	Outstanding of row Courtney Kaniewski-	Very Good of row Courtney Kaniewski-	Satisfactory of row Courtney Kaniewski-	Needs Improvement of row Courtney Kaniewski-	Unsatisfactory of row Courtney Kaniewski-
Andrea Martin	Outstanding of row Andrea Martin-	Very Good of row Andrea Martin-	Satisfactory of row Andrea Martin-	Needs Improvement of row Andrea Martin-	Unsatisfactory of row Andrea Martin-
Shamika Miller	Outstanding of row Shamika Miller-	Very Good of row Shamika Miller-	Satisfactory of row Shamika Miller-	Needs Improvement of row Shamika Miller-	Unsatisfactory of row Shamika Miller-
Tim Nguyen	Outstanding of row Tim Nguyen-	Very Good of row Tim Nguyen-	Satisfactory of row Tim Nguyen-	Needs Improvement of row Tim Nguyen-	Unsatisfactory of row Tim Nguyen-
Christina Pez	Outstanding of row Christina Pez-	Very Good of row Christina Pez-	Satisfactory of row Christina Pez-	Needs Improvement of row Christina Pez-	Unsatisfactory of row Christina Pez-
Chris Swanson	Outstanding of row Chris Swanson-	Very Good of row Chris Swanson-	Satisfactory of row Chris Swanson-	Needs Improvement of row Chris Swanson-	Unsatisfactory of row Chris Swanson-

2. If you selected Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory for any of the above adjunct faculty, please explain your choice.