Skip survey header

PN2 Theory Evaluation (January 2026-December 2026)

PN2 Theory Evaluation (January 2026-December 2026)

The PN Faculty would like your assistance in improving this course and the program.

Please think about each statement, be honest, and add written comments that help explain any "Disagree" or Strongly Disagree" ratings.  (All submissions are anonymous.)
1. Please select your cohort.
2. Please select your course.
3. Textbook and other resources supported the LAP assignments and activities.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
4. Various teaching methods were used in class to facilitate learning (Examples: presentations, group activities, projects, demonstrations, self-directed study, etc.).
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
5. Student participation and questions were encouraged.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
6. Course description and objectives were understandable.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
7. LAP assignments and activities were useful in learning the material.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
8. Test questions pertained to the LAP objectives, curriculum content, and the reading assignments.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
9. The classroom learning environment was conducive to learning the material.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
10. Technology used in the course was adequate and support was available as needed.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
11. Canvas was easy to use, and the information provided was useful in learning the material.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
12. Classroom and/or the skills lab environment was conducive to learning.
Strongly AgreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeN/A
0%