2025 MidAIR Conference Evaluation

1. How many MidAIR conferences have you attended, including this year?

• 1-2
• 3-4
• 5-6
• 7-8
• 9-10
• 11+

4. Which of the following best describes your institution or organization?

• Public
• Private/Independent
• Government
• Sponsor
• Other Please enter an 'other' value for this selection.

5. How many years have you been involved in institutional research, planning, policy analysis, or related areas?

• 1-2
• 3-4
• 5-6
• 7-8
• 9-10
• 11-15
• 16-20
• 21+

6. Which of the following best describes your primary area of responsibility?

• Academic Affairs
• Admissions/Financial Aid
• Budget/Finance
• Institutional Research/Planning
• Policy Analysis
• Registrar
• Student Affairs
• Other (please specify) Please enter an 'other' value for this selection.

7. Please rate your experience in the following areas related to this year's conference.

Space Cell	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent	N/A
Registration process	Registration process: Poor	Registration process: Fair	Registration process: Good	Registration process: Excellent	Registration process: N/A
Choice in programming options	Choice in programming options: Poor	Choice in programming options: Fair	Choice in programming options: Good	Choice in programming options: Excellent	Choice in programming options: N/A
Organization of the conference	Organization of the conference: Poor	Organization of the conference: Fair	Organization of the conference: Good	Organization of the conference: Excellent	Organization of the conference: N/A
Time to socialize / network	Time to socialize / network: Poor	Time to socialize / network: Fair	Time to socialize / network: Good	Time to socialize / network: Excellent	Time to socialize / network: N/A
Cost of conference	Cost of conference: Poor	Cost of conference: Fair	Cost of conference: Good	Cost of conference: Excellent	Cost of conference: N/A
Variety of paper / panel presentations	Variety of paper / panel presentations: Poor	Variety of paper / panel presentations: Fair	Variety of paper / panel presentations: Good	Variety of paper / panel presentations: Excellent	Variety of paper / panel presentations: N/A
Quality of paper / panel presentations	Quality of paper / panel presentations: Poor	Quality of paper / panel presentations: Fair	Quality of paper / panel presentations: Good	Quality of paper / panel presentations: Excellent	Quality of paper / panel presentations: N/A
Usabililty / quality of presentation medium (e.g. Zoom)	Usabililty / quality of presentation medium (e.g. Zoom): Poor	Usabililty / quality of presentation medium (e.g. Zoom): Fair	Usabililty / quality of presentation medium (e.g. Zoom): Good	Usabililty / quality of presentation medium (e.g. Zoom): Excellent	Usabililty / quality of presentation medium (e.g. Zoom): N/A
How would you rate the overall conference?	How would you rate the overall conference?: Poor	How would you rate the overall conference?: Fair	How would you rate the overall conference?: Good	How would you rate the overall conference?: Excellent	How would you rate the overall conference?: N/A

8. How well do you feel the content of the program matched your expectations?

• Not at All
• Somewhat
• Fairly Well
• Very Well

9. To what extent to you believe you can apply information learned at this year's conference to your work?

• Not at All
• Somewhat
• Fairly Well
• Very Well

10. Would you recommend this conference to other IR professionals?

• Definitely not
• Probably not
• Probably
• Definitely

11. Did you feel your attendance this year was worthwhile?

• Yes
• No
• Unsure