We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

V2 - Post Site Visit Feedback from the Education Program Director

Introduction

The purpose of this survey is to gather feedback on the performance of the site visit team and the way the site visit was conducted. The survey typically requires no more than 8 minutes to complete.

Please read all questions carefully. You are free to skip any question you do not wish to answer once the identifying prompts are completed. If you wish to skip a question, please leave the question response blank.

If you have additional comments, contact Robin Seabrook (rseabrook@ncope.org) or Chris Robinson (crobinson@ncope.org).

1. Program Type: *This question is required.

2. Accreditation/Recognition Being Sought *This question is required.

3. Sponsor Institution: *This question is required.

4. Person Providing Feedback

First Name *This question is required.

Last Name *This question is required.

Title

Email Address

Phone Number

Site Visit Conduct

5. The lead site visitor was responsive to communication that occurred before the site visit.

6. Rate your level of satisfaction with the site visit team.

For any resource you did not utilize, please select "N/A" from the choices provided.

Space Cell	Acceptable	Needs Improvement	N/A
Familiarity with relevant CAAHEP standards	Familiarity with relevant CAAHEP standards: Acceptable	Familiarity with relevant CAAHEP standards: Needs Improvement	Familiarity with relevant CAAHEP standards: N/A
Familiarity with program's self-study report and other program provided documentation	Familiarity with program's self-study report and other program provided documentation: Acceptable	Familiarity with program's self-study report and other program provided documentation: Needs Improvement	Familiarity with program's self-study report and other program provided documentation: N/A
Punctuality and efficient use of time	Punctuality and efficient use of time: Acceptable	Punctuality and efficient use of time: Needs Improvement	Punctuality and efficient use of time: N/A
Professionalism during interactions with faculty, staff, and students	Professionalism during interactions with faculty, staff, and students: Acceptable	Professionalism during interactions with faculty, staff, and students: Needs Improvement	Professionalism during interactions with faculty, staff, and students: N/A
Asked relevant questions	Asked relevant questions: Acceptable	Asked relevant questions: Needs Improvement	Asked relevant questions: N/A
Objectivity in documenting and reporting findings	Objectivity in documenting and reporting findings: Acceptable	Objectivity in documenting and reporting findings: Needs Improvement	Objectivity in documenting and reporting findings: N/A
Maintaince of confidentiality with program-specific and other sensitive information	Maintaince of confidentiality with program-specific and other sensitive information: Acceptable	Maintaince of confidentiality with program-specific and other sensitive information: Needs Improvement	Maintaince of confidentiality with program-specific and other sensitive information: N/A
Ability to conduct a clear and effective exit conference with the program director and designated faculty/staff	Ability to conduct a clear and effective exit conference with the program director and designated faculty/staff: Acceptable	Ability to conduct a clear and effective exit conference with the program director and designated faculty/staff: Needs Improvement	Ability to conduct a clear and effective exit conference with the program director and designated faculty/staff: N/A
Ability to draft a site visit report that was a fair reflection of the information captured during the site visit	Ability to draft a site visit report that was a fair reflection of the information captured during the site visit : Acceptable	Ability to draft a site visit report that was a fair reflection of the information captured during the site visit : Needs Improvement	Ability to draft a site visit report that was a fair reflection of the information captured during the site visit : N/A

7. What suggestion do you have to improve future site visits?

8. Are you willing to answer some additional questions about the effectiveness of individual site visit team members?

Selecting "Yes" will prompt you to rate each site visitors performance using a likert scale. An open text prompt is also provided to offer narrative feedback on each site visitor. *This question is required.

Accreditation Resources

Your feedback on accreditation resources available to O&P education program faculty/staff is needed to help NCOPE and CAAHEP's goal of continuous quality improvement. Links to the online resources we are seeking feedback on are accessible below.

NCOPE Accreditation Manual - https://ncope.org/index.php/home-page-v2/academic-programs/institution-educator-info/accreditation-manual/
CAAHEP Website (Program Directors) - https://www.caahep.org/program-directors/program-directors
NCOPE Website (Academic Administrators and Faculty) - https://ncope.org/index.php/home-page-v2/academic-programs/institution-educator-info/

9. Rate your level of satisfaction with the information and/or assistance provided by NCOPE/CAAHEP staff.

For any resource you did not utilize, please select "N/A" from the choices provided.

Space Cell	Acceptable	Needs Improvement	N/A
NCOPE Staff	NCOPE Staff: Acceptable	NCOPE Staff: Needs Improvement	NCOPE Staff: N/A
CAAHEP Staff	CAAHEP Staff: Acceptable	CAAHEP Staff: Needs Improvement	CAAHEP Staff: N/A
NCOPE Accreditation Manual	NCOPE Accreditation Manual: Acceptable	NCOPE Accreditation Manual: Needs Improvement	NCOPE Accreditation Manual: N/A
CAAHEP Website - Program Director Resources	CAAHEP Website - Program Director Resources: Acceptable	CAAHEP Website - Program Director Resources: Needs Improvement	CAAHEP Website - Program Director Resources: N/A
NCOPE Website - Academic Administrator and Faculty Resources	NCOPE Website - Academic Administrator and Faculty Resources: Acceptable	NCOPE Website - Academic Administrator and Faculty Resources: Needs Improvement	NCOPE Website - Academic Administrator and Faculty Resources: N/A

10. What suggestion do you have to improve accreditation resources?

11. Do you have any other comments regarding the site visit and comprehensive accreditation resources?

Select the "Next" button to provide feedback about individual site visitors.

Select the "Submit" button to share your feedback with NCOPE. Your survey will be marked complete once the "Thank You" page is displayed.