Skip survey header

2022 Spring Symposium

Program Evaluation

Program Evaluation *This question is required.
Space Cell ExcellentGoodAverageFairNo Opinion
Overall, the Symposium was:
Overall, the Educational Content was:
The Exhibits were:
The Statewide Research Showcase was:
The Resident Speaker Forum was:
The Symposium length was:
Please answer the following questions regarding conflicts of interest or commercial support: *This question is required.
Space Cell YesNo
Disclosure of whether or not each individual in control of content had conflicts of interest with ACCME defined commercial interests was provided in advance of my participation in the accredited education.
Disclosure of whether or not there was commercial support received from ACCME defined commercial interests was provided in advance of my participation in the accredited education

Please assess your Spring Symposium experience on the following items:

*This question is required.
Space Cell Strongly agreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly disagree
The learning objectives were actionable and measurable and supported by the activity content.
The activity format was appropriate for the setting and relevant to my practice.
The activity content was fair balanced, free of bias, and used generic names for drugs or equipment or reflected trade names from several companies.
Patient treatment recommendations were evidence-based, appropriate for audience, and will contribute to overall improvements in care.
Scientific studies cited within the activity conform to standards acceptable by the scientific community.

Educational Content:

*This question is required.
Space Cell YesNo
Are there any issues you would like to raise regarding the activity content?

Change in Practice:

*This question is required.
Space Cell YesNo
Will you make changes in your practice because of your participation in the activity?