We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

Course Evaluation - Review of Facial Feminization Surgery: Dr. Sara Danker, Dr. Lauren Yarholar, University of Miami

Course Evaluation

Indications, reasoning, goals, and techniques of facial feminization will be reviewed.

Dr. Sara Danker is a board-certified plastic surgeon who specializes in microsurgery and gender-affirmation surgery. She trained with Dr. Jens Berli at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, OR and is a member of WPATH.

Dr. Lauren Yarholar is a board-eligible plastic surgeon who specializes in adult & pediatric craniofacial surgery. She completed craniofacial fellowship with Dr. Eduardo Rodriguez at NYU Langone Health in New York City.

Both are gender-affirming surgeons in the Division of Plastic Surgery at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.

1. Please X or check your selected responses to the statements below.

Space Cell	Strongly Agree	Agree	Nuetral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The presenter(s) was interesting.	The presenter(s) was interesting.: Strongly Agree	The presenter(s) was interesting.: Agree	The presenter(s) was interesting.: Nuetral	The presenter(s) was interesting.: Disagree	The presenter(s) was interesting.: Strongly Disagree
The presenter(s) was organized/prepared.	The presenter(s) was organized/prepared.: Strongly Agree	The presenter(s) was organized/prepared.: Agree	The presenter(s) was organized/prepared.: Nuetral	The presenter(s) was organized/prepared.: Disagree	The presenter(s) was organized/prepared.: Strongly Disagree
The presenter(s) was flexible and engaging in approach.	The presenter(s) was flexible and engaging in approach.: Strongly Agree	The presenter(s) was flexible and engaging in approach.: Agree	The presenter(s) was flexible and engaging in approach.: Nuetral	The presenter(s) was flexible and engaging in approach.: Disagree	The presenter(s) was flexible and engaging in approach.: Strongly Disagree
The presenter(s) was responsive to individual participants.	The presenter(s) was responsive to individual participants.: Strongly Agree	The presenter(s) was responsive to individual participants.: Agree	The presenter(s) was responsive to individual participants.: Nuetral	The presenter(s) was responsive to individual participants.: Disagree	The presenter(s) was responsive to individual participants.: Strongly Disagree
Course material met stated objectives and/or description.	Course material met stated objectives and/or description.: Strongly Agree	Course material met stated objectives and/or description.: Agree	Course material met stated objectives and/or description.: Nuetral	Course material met stated objectives and/or description.: Disagree	Course material met stated objectives and/or description.: Strongly Disagree
The course was valuable and useful to my work.	The course was valuable and useful to my work.: Strongly Agree	The course was valuable and useful to my work.: Agree	The course was valuable and useful to my work.: Nuetral	The course was valuable and useful to my work.: Disagree	The course was valuable and useful to my work.: Strongly Disagree
The supporting course materials were helpful.	The supporting course materials were helpful.: Strongly Agree	The supporting course materials were helpful.: Agree	The supporting course materials were helpful.: Nuetral	The supporting course materials were helpful.: Disagree	The supporting course materials were helpful.: Strongly Disagree

2. Copy of Please X or check your selected responses to the three statements below.

Space Cell	Excellent	Good	Adequate	Fair	Nuetral	Poor
What is your overall evaluation of supporting course materials?	What is your overall evaluation of supporting course materials?: Excellent	What is your overall evaluation of supporting course materials?: Good	What is your overall evaluation of supporting course materials?: Adequate	What is your overall evaluation of supporting course materials?: Fair	What is your overall evaluation of supporting course materials?: Nuetral	What is your overall evaluation of supporting course materials?: Poor
What is your overall evaluation of this course?	What is your overall evaluation of this course?: Excellent	What is your overall evaluation of this course?: Good	What is your overall evaluation of this course?: Adequate	What is your overall evaluation of this course?: Fair	What is your overall evaluation of this course?: Nuetral	What is your overall evaluation of this course?: Poor

3. What suggestions do you have for improvements to this course?

4. What future programs and/or trainings you would like to see offered? Other feedback?

5. How did you hear about today’s event? Please be as specific as possible.

6. And now your opportunity to brag. What did you love about the course? Maybe include your biggest takeaways and how will this workshop specifically impact your work or life.