ND Indicator 3D Target Setting

Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback on the proposed targets for Indicator 3D.

The North Dakota Department of Public Instruction values your input!

Demographic information is collected to show the federal Office of Special Education Programs that broad stakeholder involvement was solicited

1. What is your primary role? *This question is required.

Please enter an 'other' value for this selection.

2. Are you a parent/guardian of a student with a disability? *This question is required.

3. What is your Race/Ethnicity? *This question is required.

4. In what town do you live? *This question is required.

Indicator 3D: Grade 4 Math Gap Data
The gap proficiency rates for children with IEPs and all students against grade level academic achievement standards.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3D. The baseline year is red. The target must be lower than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 19.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

5. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

5a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

6. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the decrease in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

6a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3D: Grade 8 Math Gap Data
The gap proficiency rates for children with IEPs and all students against grade level academic achievement standards.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3D. The baseline year is red. The target must be lower than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 26.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

7. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

7a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

8. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the decrease in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

8a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3D: High School Math Gap Data
The gap proficiency rates for children with IEPs and all students against grade level academic achievement standards.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3D. The baseline year is red. The target must be lower than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 20.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

9. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

9a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

10. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the decrease in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

10a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3D: Grade 4 Reading Gap Data
The gap proficiency rates for children with IEPs and all students against grade level academic achievement standards.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3D. The baseline year is red. The target must be lower than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 22.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

11. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

11a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

12. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the decrease in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

12a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3D: Grade 8 Reading Gap Data
The gap proficiency rates for children with IEPs and all students against grade level academic achievement standards.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3D. The baseline year is red. The target must be lower than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 35.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

13. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

13a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

14. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the decrease in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

14a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3D: High School Reading Gap Data
The gap proficiency rates for children with IEPs and all students against grade level academic achievement standards.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3D. The baseline year is red. The target must be lower than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 30.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

15. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

15a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

16. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the decrease in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

16a. If no, please explain.