ND Indicator 3C Target Setting

Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback on the proposed targets for Indicator 3C.

The North Dakota Department of Public Instruction values your input!

Demographic information is collected to show the federal Office of Special Education Programs that broad stakeholder involvement was solicited

1. What is your primary role? *This question is required.

Please enter an 'other' value for this selection.

2. Are you a parent/guardian of a student with a disability? *This question is required.

3. What is your Race/Ethnicity? *This question is required.

4. In what town do you live? *This question is required.

Indicator 3C: Grade 4 Math Proficiency on Alternate Assessment
The percent of youth with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who were proficient on the alternate assessment.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3C. The baseline year is red. The target must be higher than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 34.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

5. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

5a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

6. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the increase in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

6a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3C: Grade 8 Math Proficiency on Alternate Assessment
The percent of youth with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who were proficient on the alternate assessment.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3C. The baseline year is red. The target must be higher than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 16.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

7. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

7a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

8. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the increase in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

8a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3C: High School Math Proficiency on Alternate Assessment
The percent of youth with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who were proficient on the alternate assessment.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3C. The baseline year is red. The target must be higher than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 38.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

9. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

9a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

10. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the increase in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

10a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3C: Grade 4 Reading Proficiency on Alternate Assessment
The percent of youth with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who were proficient on the alternate assessment.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3C. The baseline year is red. The target must be higher than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 59.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

11. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

11a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

12. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the increase in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

12a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3C: Grade 8 Reading Proficiency on Alternate Assessment
The percent of youth with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who were proficient on the alternate assessment.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3C. The baseline year is red. The target must be higher than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 41.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

13. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

13a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

14. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the increase in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

14a. If no, please explain.

Indicator 3C: High School Reading Proficiency on Alternate Assessment
The percent of youth with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who were proficient on the alternate assessment.

The graph below shows the historical data for Indicator 3C. The baseline year is red. The target must be higher than the baseline year. The recommended target for 2025-26 is 44.00%. The table below shows the recommended targets between now and 2025-26.

15. In my opinion, the recommended target for 2025-26 is:

15a. If you chose “Too High” or “Too Low,” explain your selection.

16. Do you approve the targets between 2020-21 and 2025-26? Note that the increase in targets is small at the beginning and large at the end so that districts have time to change and improve their practices.

16a. If no, please explain.