We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

2021 Career Relevance Convening Evaluation

Thank you for attending the 2021 Career Relevance Convening! We enjoyed hosting over 160 Indiana higher education administrators and employers for a discussion on the Commission's strategic objective to ensure career relevance in postsecondary education. Please take a few minutes to complete the evaluation so we can continue to engage with you in meaningful ways on this topic.

1. Please indicate your overall satisfaction with the conference program and logistics.

Space Cell	Agree	Neutral	Disagree
Overall, I learned something new about higher education policy.	Overall, I learned something new about higher education policy.: Agree	Overall, I learned something new about higher education policy.: Neutral	Overall, I learned something new about higher education policy.: Disagree
Overall, the conference was worth the time, effort and resources to attend.	Overall, the conference was worth the time, effort and resources to attend.: Agree	Overall, the conference was worth the time, effort and resources to attend.: Neutral	Overall, the conference was worth the time, effort and resources to attend.: Disagree
The communications leading up to the event were clear and concise.	The communications leading up to the event were clear and concise. : Agree	The communications leading up to the event were clear and concise. : Neutral	The communications leading up to the event were clear and concise. : Disagree
If another conference on education policy was offered again, I would attend.	If another conference on education policy was offered again, I would attend.: Agree	If another conference on education policy was offered again, I would attend.: Neutral	If another conference on education policy was offered again, I would attend.: Disagree
I prefer the virtual format to a traditional (in-person) format for this conference.	I prefer the virtual format to a traditional (in-person) format for this conference. : Agree	I prefer the virtual format to a traditional (in-person) format for this conference. : Neutral	I prefer the virtual format to a traditional (in-person) format for this conference. : Disagree

2. Please evaluate the Opening Keynote with Commissioner Lubbers, Pete Yonkman and Ruth Watkins.

Space Cell	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Did Not Attend
Their remarks were relevant and thought-provoking.	Their remarks were relevant and thought-provoking.: Agree	Their remarks were relevant and thought-provoking.: Neutral	Their remarks were relevant and thought-provoking.: Disagree	Their remarks were relevant and thought-provoking.: Did Not Attend
They seemed prepared and knowledgeable.	They seemed prepared and knowledgeable.: Agree	They seemed prepared and knowledgeable.: Neutral	They seemed prepared and knowledgeable.: Disagree	They seemed prepared and knowledgeable.: Did Not Attend
I learned something new that will help me in my work.	I learned something new that will help me in my work.: Agree	I learned something new that will help me in my work.: Neutral	I learned something new that will help me in my work.: Disagree	I learned something new that will help me in my work.: Did Not Attend
The format (virtual with chat feature) was an adequate way to respond to the keynote.	The format (virtual with chat feature) was an adequate way to respond to the keynote.: Agree	The format (virtual with chat feature) was an adequate way to respond to the keynote.: Neutral	The format (virtual with chat feature) was an adequate way to respond to the keynote.: Disagree	The format (virtual with chat feature) was an adequate way to respond to the keynote.: Did Not Attend

3. Any additional comments about the keynote speakers?

5. Please evaluate the breakout session you attended.

Space Cell	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Did Not Attend Session
The panelists were knowledgeable in their subject area.	The panelists were knowledgeable in their subject area.: Agree	The panelists were knowledgeable in their subject area.: Neutral	The panelists were knowledgeable in their subject area.: Disagree	The panelists were knowledgeable in their subject area.: Did Not Attend Session
The breakout facilitator maintained conversation and was thought provoking.	The breakout facilitator maintained conversation and was thought provoking. : Agree	The breakout facilitator maintained conversation and was thought provoking. : Neutral	The breakout facilitator maintained conversation and was thought provoking. : Disagree	The breakout facilitator maintained conversation and was thought provoking. : Did Not Attend Session
The breakout sessions were well planned and presented.	The breakout sessions were well planned and presented.: Agree	The breakout sessions were well planned and presented.: Neutral	The breakout sessions were well planned and presented.: Disagree	The breakout sessions were well planned and presented.: Did Not Attend Session
I learned something new that will help me in my work.	I learned something new that will help me in my work.: Agree	I learned something new that will help me in my work.: Neutral	I learned something new that will help me in my work.: Disagree	I learned something new that will help me in my work.: Did Not Attend Session

6. Any additional comments about the breakout sessions?

7. How did the conference meet, exceed or fall short of your expectations? Are there any particular topics the Commission should consider for future convenings that would be relevant?

8. On the subject of career relevance, how would you prefer to engage with the Commission on this topic (more convening like this, campus-based forums, webinars, etc.)?